Providing credible, rigorously evaluated resources
Consider Quality and Practical characteristics of your selected resources alongside pedagogic and policy fit.
Use the BASIC method to help in the evaluation process.
Does the content include several perspectives, show how meaning is negotiated and established, provide the historical angle, explore dissenting views and even include those from outside the discipline?
Is the content authoritative? Have you determined the validity of the resource, taken into account new perspectives and changes in thought, and questioned the origin and context of the created information?
Acknowledge that biases arising from positions of privilege can arise from accepted sources of authority. Apply this understanding to all formats you select, including online videos and images.
Is the content at the appropriate AQF level for your course? Does it meet the benchmarks of a School policy or the standards of industry, sector or professional regulatory bodies?
Do your search strategies for teaching content retrieve the results to meet the information needs of your students? Will your students be able to achieve the learning outcomes of the AQF level by interacting with material you have selected?
Is the content you select culturally appropriate, sensitive and inclusive of indigenous peoples? Does your selection of material encourage Indigenous Knowledges? Has the content been evaluated for authenticity and accuracy with input from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples?
Know your student cohort. Are your selected resources appropriate for international, rural and low socio-economic status students?
For example:
Are your resources current, or, in the case of set textbooks, is a more recent edition available? Perhaps you have a range of authoritative materials that span recent decades.
Whilst in some disciplines older works may be most authoritative, recent works should be presented to students for them to explore emergent schools of thought and new discoveries. New research must be acknowledged in the scholarly conversation, encouraging further contributions to research in the discipline.
Is the format accessible – in print or electronic version?
Is the resource legitimate, legal to use?
Consider equity of access for all students. What is the cost for students?
Is a suitable licence available?
Will the resource be available to students in China or other teaching locations?
Arkoudis, S. (n.d.). Teaching international students: Strategies to enhance learning. https://msd.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/3064372/ArkoudisS-Teaching-International-ST.pdf
Association of College and Research Libraries. (2015). Framework for information literacy for higher education. American Library Association. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
Centre for Learning Innovation and Professional Practice (CLIPP). (2019). BOLD learning and teaching practices. https://federation.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/425373/BOLD_LT_PRACTICES_July2019_Print.pdf
International Center for Academic Integrity. (2021). The fundamental values of academic integrity. https://academicintegrity.org/images/pdfs/20019_ICAI-Fundamental-Values_R12.pdf
Queensland Studies Authority. (2007). Selecting and evaluating resources (Indigenous Perspectives Guidelines, Issue G008). https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/downloads/approach2/indigenous_g008_0712.pdf
Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency. (2019). Guidance Note: Academic Integrity. https://www.teqsa.gov.au/latest-news/publications/guidance-note-academic-integrity
Accreditation requirements by any relevant registering bodies is an essential component of curriculum resource choice for some industries.
Contact your Liaison Librarian for assistance with selecting resources.
Contact Details: Research and Learning Services Team