Skip to Main Content

Reviewing the literature

Writing a review

The type of review determines how it is written. While there are similarities, there are also differences. 

Differences:

All types of reviews: 

Literature review

Focusses on the research gap and comparing and contrasting studies related to it
  • are planned carefully with the aims clearly in    focus
  • involve stages or steps
  • compare and contrast research on the topic
  • are clearly structured with no extraneous sections
  • narrow down from broader literature to specific details
  • are written with clarity, economy, and precise sentence structure
  • use academic writing style and require careful editing and revising

Scoping review

Maps key concepts and evidence, find the breadth of a field. Broad aims or question

Systematic review

Answers very specific questions

Meta-analysis

Uses statistical methods to synthesise data from a number of studies

The All reviews page describes the elements of writing a review article that are common to all reviews. For information about elements that are different, see the scoping review or systematic review pages. 

The information in the Writing tab summarises the document below.

Review sections

Sections in a review are: 

Abstract
  • A structured abstract
Introduction
  • Rationale
  • Objectives
  • Research question or aim
Methods
  • Eligibility criteria
  • Information sources
  • Search strategy
  • Selection of sources of evidence
  • Data charting process
  • Data items
Results 
  • Search results
  • Characteristics of sources of evidence
Discussion
  • What the results mean
  • Recommendations
  • Conclusion
Further content
  • Reference list
  • Further data or appendices

Review templates

This document is a fillable PDF for writing reviews.